Rising climate scepticism shows 'vested interests propaganda machine is working'
🇺🇸 Traducido al English

Rising climate scepticism shows 'vested interests propaganda machine is working'

ONE in four British citizens believe that concerns about climate change have been exaggerated, according to research published today, with campaigners warning that propaganda on behalf of vested interests is working. The research, carried out for the Times by YouGov and the opinion consultancy Public First, was compared with another study carried by the newspaper in 2021.Since then, the number of Britons who think the dangers of global warming have been exaggerated has soared by more than 50 per cent, the survey suggested.

Redacción NoticiaViralFriday, April 3, 20262 minde lectura1lecturas
Compartir:

ONE in four British citizens believe that concerns about climate change have been exaggerated, according to research published today, with campaigners warning that propaganda on behalf of vested interests is working. The research, carried out for the Times by YouGov and the opinion consultancy Public First, was compared with another study carried by the newspaper in 2021. Since then, the number of Britons who think the dangers of global warming have been exaggerated has soared by more than 50 per cent, the survey suggested. Out of the 1,600 polled in 2021, 16 per cent believed warnings about climate change are not as real as scientists have said, compared with some 25 per cent today. Similarly, 16 per cent now think global warming is not the result of human activity, a rise of 5 per cent over four years. And the number of people who have confidence in the government’s pledge to reach net zero by 2050 halved from 32 per cent to 15 per cent. Shaun Spiers, head of the Green Alliance, told the Times that the think tank has seen a “concentrated, well-funded attack on net zero for several years now." “Anybody who gets their news from GB News, for instance, is getting a lot of scepticism all the time.” A 2023 DeSmog investigation found that the channel’s co-owner Paul Marshall had over £1.8 billion invested in fossil fuels. Reform’s Nigel Farage, a channel regular, has called for net-zero policies to be scrapped and for Britain to be “self-sufficient” in gas. The survey shows that the “vested interests propaganda machine is working,” an Extinction Rebellion spokesperson told the Morning Star. “We should expect [so, given] the money they pump in to deceive people. “This campaign of disinformation, if allowed to continue, will lead to thousands, if not millions, of unnecessary deaths.” Only 30 per cent of the public are in favour of banning new petrol and diesel cars, compared with 51 per cent previously, the Times reported. Just 16 per cent said they would be prepared to pay higher gas bills to encourage the switch to electricity. Green Alliance polling shows that two in five people will struggle to pay their bills this year. Mr Spiers added: “It’s no surprise that politicians who overstate the costs, and underestimate the benefits, of a greener economy are getting traction.”

¿Te gustó esta noticia?

¡Compártela con tus amigos y familia!

Cada compartido ayuda a que más personas lean esta noticia 🙏

Volver al inicio

También te puede interesar

Seleccionado especialmente para ti

Foundations of climate change denial: Anti-environmentalism and anti-science
🔬 Ciencia

Foundations of climate change denial: Anti-environmentalism and anti-science

Despite a longstanding scientific consensus about the reality of anthropogenic global warming (AGW), a climate change countermovement (CCCM) has worked to undermine and cast doubt on climate science for over three decades. The CCCM is a coalition led by fossil fuel corporations and their advocacy organizations, far-right conservative think tanks (CTTs), conservative foundations and a few dissenting scientists that has successfully thwarted domestic mitigation policies and international agreements aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). Social science investigations into the CCCM have become increasingly sophisticated and have provided key insights into the content and influence of AGW denial narratives. Denial narratives reject the basic findings of climate science: the earth is warming (trend denial), largely due to human actions (attribution denial), producing harmful impacts (impact denial), and mitigation policies are ineffective or harmful (policy denial). These narratives cast the integrity of climate science and scientists in doubt; yet a fine-grained analysis of denial narratives has not been conducted. To fill this gap, we analyze the content of 108 books that reject climate science using a two-stage content analysis approach: first, a deductive approach to identify denial claims in the books, and second an inductive approach to analyze the larger semantic ecosystems surrounding the claims. We confirm the major narratives that have been identified in prior research, but discover a consistent, underlying anti-environmentalism along with a rejection of “impact science” that highlights the negative effects of industrial production. These two meta-themes challenge reflexive modernization, which relies on scientific knowledge and global environmentalism to solve environmental problems. This reflects a deep “anti-reflexivity” employed to combat forces promoting the need for major reductions in GHGs and a shift to renewable energy. This anti-reflexive DNA of climate denial serves to protect power and privilege systems formed since industrialization, which has been powered by fossil fuels.

Redacción NoticiaViral3 abr 20261
Climate anxiety is altering family planning. Should it?
🔬 Ciencia

Climate anxiety is altering family planning. Should it?

Gen Z and younger millennials are generally the most climate literate generations. As an age cohort that started learning about climate change in school, they're worried about how to plan for their future jobs, houses and, yes, kids. With climate-related disasters and global warming likely to worsen, climate anxiety is giving way to reproductive anxiety. So, what do experts say about how to navigate the kid question?On this encore episode of Nature Quest, Short Wave speaks to Alessandra Ram, a journalist covering climate change, who just had a kid. We get into the future she sees for her newborn daughter and ask, how do we raise the next generation in a way that's good for the planet?Here are the resources recommended by the experts we interviewed for this story:Action Tools and Community ResourcesThe High-Impact Climate Action Guide by Kimberly A. NicholasThe Climate Mental Health Network and Climate Emotions WheelThe Climate Café® Hub - for finding a local groupBooks and Research PapersClimate Anxiety and the Kid Question: Deciding Whether to Have Children in an Uncertain Future, by Jade S. SasserParenting in a Changing Climate: Tools for cultivating resilience, taking action, and practicing hope in the face of climate change, by Elizabeth BechardUnder the Sky We Make: How to Be Human in a Warming World, by Kimberly A. NicholasThe role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions, Nielsen, K.S., Nicholas, K.A., Creutzig, F. et al. Got a question about changes in your local environment? Send a voice memo to [email protected] with your name, where you live and your question. You might make it into our next Nature Quest episode!Listen to every episode of Short Wave sponsor-free and support our work at NPR by signing up for Short Wave+ at plus.npr.org/shortwave.

Redacción NoticiaViral3 abr 20261

Comentarios

Deja tu comentario

0/2000

Sé el primero en comentar esta noticia.

Los comentarios son revisados antes de publicarse. Mantén un tono respetuoso.

¡Comparte esta noticia!

Rising climate scepticism shows 'vested interests propaganda machine is working'

ONE in four British citizens believe that concerns about climate change have been exaggerated, according to research published today, with campaigners warning that propaganda on behalf of vested interests is working. The research, carried out for the Times by YouGov and the opinion consultancy Public First, was compared with another study carried by the newspaper in 2021.Since then, the number of Britons who think the dangers of global warming have been exaggerated has soared by more than 50 per cent, the survey suggested.

Usamos cookies para mejorar tu experiencia

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para personalizar el contenido, mostrar publicidad relevante y analizar el tráfico.

Política de privacidad